SID Information Display Magazine
Invited Feature Article on Tablet
Displays
Tablets Are Trending Better, Bigger, and Brighter
The key element for a great
tablet has always been a truly innovative and top-performing display, and the
best leading-edge tablets have always had beautiful displays. But tablet
displays are challenging to produce because of their large screens, which are
3–4 times the size of smartphone screens. DisplayMate’s Ray Soneira
discusses the major factors affecting tablet performance and popularity, as
well as what improvements we are likely to see in the near future.
Dr. Raymond M. Soneira
President, DisplayMate Technologies Corporation
Copyright © 2014 by Society for Information Display. All Rights
Reserved.
Copyright © 1990-2014 by DisplayMate Technologies Corporation. All
Rights Reserved.
This article, or any part thereof, may not be copied,
reproduced, mirrored, distributed or incorporated
into any other work without the prior written permission of
DisplayMate Technologies Corporation
STARTING IN 2010, when Apple made the Retina display and
display-quality central themes for its product marketing, displays have
experienced an unprecedented renaissance in new technologies for smartphones,
tablets, TVs, and even new classes of products such as wearable displays.
Apple has recently given up the lead in displays – now Amazon, Google,
LG, and Samsung are launching products with the best and most innovative
displays, as documented in our Display
Technology Shoot-Out article series.
The new iPad mini Retina display, for example, recently came in a distant third
place finish.
This article looks at several of the most recent
mobile-device display enhancements in terms of tablets, a product category not
invented by Apple, but which gained large-scale commercial success only after
the introduction of the iPad in 2010. Hopefully, Apple will join the
leaders again with new and innovative displays in 2014. In the meantime,
here is a roster of display advances that involve tablets.
Full Color Gamut
Up until recently, most LCDs had only 55–65% of the standard
sRGB/Rec.709 color gamut that is used in producing virtually all current
consumer content. This resulted in subdued colors in images, videos, and
photos, a limitation that stems from the traditional reduction in brightness
and power efficiency as the color gamut is increased for LCDs. This
limitation can now be overcome using quantum-dot technology, which can
efficiently enlarge the color gamut to greater than 100% for high ambient light
and other applications. For more about quantum dots, see the article The
Virtues of Quantum Dots in the May/June 2014 issue of Information Display
Magazine. Most
leading LCDs now have color gamuts greater than 85%, with the best close to
100%. This has been accomplished with a number of innovative (and
costlier) approaches including using low-temperature polysilicon (LTPS)
backplanes, brighter and more efficient white LEDs in backlights, and better
optics and optical films. Other methods include trading some peak
brightness for a larger color gamut, and, lastly, just using heftier batteries
to get the job done. The most notable laggards in 2013 were the iPad mini
Retina display and the Microsoft Surface 2, both with just 63% of the standard
gamut. In 2014, quantum dots will play a major role in continuing to
improve the color gamut of LCDs.
Improved Absolute Color Accuracy and Picture Quality
Image and picture quality, as well as color accuracy,
have been steadily advancing due to improved display technology, advanced
signal processing, automated factory calibration, and the motivation of
increased competition. DisplayMate’s most recent lab tests and
measurements show that the very best smartphones, tablets, and TVs are now
comparable in accuracy to professional studio monitors. With good
accuracy you will see high-fidelity presentations of your digital photos, which
is especially important because you often know exactly what everything should
actually look like. Another perhaps even more important advantage is that
online merchandise will appear with accurate colors, so you will have a very
good idea of exactly what you are buying and are less likely to return it.
Potential downsides include on-screen food that will make you
particularly hungry and shows, movies, and downloaded content that look so
great you will find yourself watching more of it!
If you have ever wondered why some colors are way off on a
display, there are many contributing factors and causes, including the color
gamut, the calibrated white point, the intensity scale, and possibly poorly
implemented dynamic picture processing and color management. It is
possible to accurately measure and map the absolute color accuracy and color
errors for any display by using a spectroradiometer and proprietary test
patterns, which we do in our Shoot-Out series. We provide both the
average and maximum color errors in terms of Just Noticeable Color Differences
(JNCD) and include a full chromaticity color accuracy map, which is shown in Figure 1 below. Color
differences less than 1 JNCD are visually indistinguishable, while values
greater than 1 JNCD are visually noticeable when the two colors are touching
on-screen. When the colors are not touching and are farther apart, the
visual threshold for just noticing a color difference on a display is higher.
Here, we will use 3 JNCD for the threshold of a visually noticeable color
difference on a display.
Figure 1: Shown is the
absolute color accuracy map for the sRGB/Rec.709 reference colors.
In 2013,
the most accurate display we measured was the LG OLED TV, with an average
absolute color error of just 1.3 JNCD, which is visually indistinguishable from
perfect. Figure 2 below shows absolute color accuracy plots for the Amazon Kindle Fire HDX
7 and Google Nexus 7, and Figure 3 below clearly shows the much larger color errors for the Apple iPad mini
Retina Display.
In 2014, we expect to see major improvements in absolute color
accuracy resulting from the use of quantum dots as well as from improved
color-management processing.
Figure 2: on top, shows the Kindle
Fire HDX and Nexus Absolute Color Accuracy Error Plots.
Figure. 3: on bottom, shows the
result for the iPad mini Retina display.
LTPS and IGZO
All LCDs
and OLED displays have an internal backplane layer that has the electronic
circuitry needed to control the millions of sub-pixels. The Backplanes
performance is especially critical in high pixels per inch (ppi) displays.
While most LCDs still use amorphous silicon (a-Si), many high-ppi LCDs
use low-temperature polysilicon (LTPS), which has considerably higher electron
mobility than a-Si, allowing the circuitry to be made much smaller. For
LCDs, the electronic circuitry for every sub-pixel takes up precious screen
area, which blocks the backlighting and decreases image brightness. LTPS
results in significantly higher luminance and improved power efficiency, but
also costs considerably more to manufacture.
Most
high-performance smartphone displays now use LTPS, including the iPhone 5 and
all mobile OLEDs (except flexibles). But most LCD tablets, monitors, and
TVs still use a-Si because their larger screens would cost considerably more to
manufacture using LTPS. An alternative backplane technology called IGZO
(indium gallium zinc oxide), which has higher performance than a-Si but lower
cost (and performance) than LTPS, was supposed to be available in 2012 for
tablets, monitors, and TVs, but major production problems have significantly
delayed and limited its availability even in 2013. This will continue
through 2014, as Sharp is the only major manufacturer that is beginning to ship
IGZO displays.
The two highest-performance tablet displays that we
recently tested, the Amazon Kindle Fire HDX 8.9 and Google Nexus 7, were the
early adopters of LTPS for tablets, while the latest iPads still rely on lower
performance a-Si and IGZO, which limits their brightness, color gamut, and
power efficiency. For 2014, the continued problems with IGZO will benefit
both LTPS and the much higher-performance metal-oxide backplanes now under
development by CBRITE, which should begin arriving by late 2014.
Tablet Outlook
While 2013
included a major shift to smaller 7–8-inch tablet displays from the
first-generation full-size 9–10-inch displays, 2014 will see tablets growing
again to include 12–13-inch tablet displays for the professional and education
markets. Microsoft has the 12.0-inch Surface Pro 3, Samsung has the
12.2-inch Tab Pro, and Apple is rumored to be producing a 12.9-inch iPad.
The screen resolution and ppi are also increasing, with high-end Android
tablets moving up to 2560 × 1600 or Quad HD (QHD) at 2560 × 1440 with 300–340
ppi based on screen size, and current Apple iPads at 2048 × 1536 with 264–326
ppi. However, a 12.9-inch iPad would only have 198 ppi, so to enable a
Retina display another higher-resolution jump to perhaps 4K, at 4096 × 3072
with 398 ppi, seems likely. High-ambient-light performance will also
continue improving, with the 2013 record holders Amazon Kindle Fire HDX 8.9
with a very low 5.0% screen reflectance, and the Nokia Lumia 2520 with a very
bright 684-cd/m2display.
Also
expected in 2014 are some high-resolution OLED tablets and many more LCD
tablets with LTPS backplanes and quantum dots that will deliver very bright and
wide-color-gamut images as mentioned above. At press time, DisplayMate
had just completed a review of the new OLED-based Galaxy
Tab S Tablets from Samsung. For more information about the Galaxy Tab
S line, see the sidebar below at the end of this article.
The most
important developments for the upcoming generations of both OLED and LCD mobile
displays will come from improvements in their image and picture quality in
ambient light, which washes out screen images, resulting in reduced
readability, image contrast, color saturation, and color accuracy. The
key will be in enlarging the native color gamut and then dynamically changing
the display’s color management and intensity scales with the measured ambient
light in order to automatically compensate for reflected glare and image
washout from ambient light, as discussed in our 2014 Innovative
Displays and Display Technology article and our Tablet
Display Technology Shoot-Out article in the July/August 2013 issue of
Information Display Magazine. The displays and technologies that succeed in implementing
this new strategy will take the lead in the next generation of mobile displays.
In 2013, the Amazon Kindle Fire HDX tablets became the
top-performing tablet displays in our Display Technology Shoot-Out series, leapfrogging
the competition with cutting-edge displays using quantum dots and LTPS.
But with the ever continuing and impressive improvements in display
technology, the OLED Samsung Galaxy Tab S has now taken the lead for the best
tablet display. With display technology advancing rapidly on many
different fronts, things can change again in the next generation of displays
for tablets and smartphones. A strong congratulations to Samsung, but
please don’t rest on your laurels – and best wishes to all the manufacturers
in developing the next generation of even higher-performance displays!
Sidebar: A Look at Samsung’s New OLED Tablets
Up until now, tablets
have been almost exclusively LCD based. There have not been any OLED
tablets, with the exception of a single 7.7-inch model from Samsung launched
in 2012.
Samsung is now
producing the Galaxy Tab S series (see Figure 4), with display performance widely expected to
be comparable to that of the OLED Galaxy S5, which is the best smartphone
display we have ever tested.
Figure. 4: Samsung’s new Galaxy
Tab S tablets are OLED based, which provides excellent performance in terms
of viewing angles. Image courtesy Samsung.
Samsung provided
DisplayMate with pre-release production units of the Galaxy Tab S tablets in
both 10.5- and 8.4-inch form factors. Here are a few highlights of the
testing results:
• Both Galaxy Tab
S models offer Quad HD 2560 × 1600-pixel displays, currently the highest
resolution for tablets, with 4.1 Mega pixels – double the number on your
HDTV. The 10.5-inch model has traditional RGB-stripe pixels with 287
pixels per inch (ppi), and the 8.4-inch model has Diamond pixels with a
proprietary diagonal, symmetrical arrangement for the red and blue sub-pixels
and sub-pixel rendering with 361 ppi. Both are higher than can be
resolved with normal 20/20 vision at the typical viewing distances for
tablets, so the displays appear perfectly sharp.
• Excellent
absolute color accuracy in the Basic screen mode with an average error of
just 2.1 JNCD, the best for any mobile display.
• Both of the
Galaxy Tab S displays have very good to excellent screen brightness, but are
not as bright as the brightest LCD tablets.
• While tablets
are primarily single-viewer devices, the variation in display performance
with viewing angle is still very important because single viewers frequently
hold the tablet at a variety of viewing angles – often up to 30° or more
when resting it on a table or desk. While LCDs typically experience a
55% or greater decrease in brightness at a 30° viewing angle, the OLED Galaxy
Tab S displays show a much smaller 21% decrease in brightness at 30°.
In summary, the Galaxy
Tab S tablets are the best-performing tablet displays that we have ever
tested. The complete set of tests and results can be found in our OLED Galaxy Tab
S Display Technology Shoot-Out article.
|
Additional Reading and Information
Much of the information in this article is drawn from my
extensive Display Technology Shoot-Out article series covering
Tablets and Smartphones (and related articles on TV and Multimedia displays).
They are now all available on the www.displaymate.com website. For
additional information on any of the topics covered here, refer to the Mobile Display and TV Multimedia Display
categories under Display Information for the list of articles.
Article
Links:
Flagship Tablet LCD
Display Technology Shoot-Out
Article
Links: Mini Tablet LCD Display
Technology Shoot-Out.
About the Author
Dr. Raymond
Soneira is President of
DisplayMate Technologies Corporation of Amherst, New Hampshire, which produces
video calibration, evaluation, and diagnostic products for consumers,
technicians, and manufacturers. See www.displaymate.com. He is a research scientist with a career
that spans physics, computer science, and television system design. Dr. Soneira
obtained his Ph.D. in Theoretical Physics from Princeton University, spent 5
years as a Long-Term Member of the world famous Institute for Advanced Study in
Princeton, another 5 years as a Principal Investigator in the Computer Systems
Research Laboratory at AT&T Bell Laboratories, and has also designed,
tested, and installed color television broadcast equipment for the CBS
Television Network Engineering and Development Department. He has authored over
35 research articles in scientific journals in physics and computer science,
including Scientific American. If you have any comments or questions about the
article, you can contact him at dtso.info@displaymate.com.
DisplayMate Display Optimization Technology
All Smartphone and
Tablets displays can be significantly improved using DisplayMate’s proprietary
very advanced scientific analysis and mathematical display modeling and
optimization of the display hardware, factory calibration, and driver
parameters. We help manufacturers with expert display procurement, prototype
development, testing displays to meet contract specifications, and production
quality control so that manufacturers don’t make mistakes similar to those that
are exposed in our public Display Technology Shoot-Out series for consumers.
This article is a lite version of our advanced scientific analysis – before the
benefits of our DisplayMate
Display Optimization Technology, which can correct or improve all of these
issues. If you are a display or product manufacturer and want to significantly
improve display performance for a competitive advantage then Contact DisplayMate Technologies.
About DisplayMate Technologies
DisplayMate Technologies specializes in proprietary advanced
scientific display calibration and mathematical display optimization to deliver
unsurpassed objective performance, picture quality and accuracy for all types
of displays including video and computer monitors, projectors, HDTVs, mobile
displays such as smartphones and tablets, and all
display technologies including LCD, OLED, 3D, LED, LCoS, Plasma, DLP and CRT. This article is a lite
version of our intensive scientific analysis of Smartphone and Smartphone
mobile displays – before the benefits of our advanced mathematical DisplayMate
Display Optimization Technology, which can correct or improve many
of the display deficiencies. We offer DisplayMate display calibration software for
consumers and advanced DisplayMate display diagnostic and calibration software
for technicians and test labs.
For manufacturers we
offer Consulting Services that include advanced Lab testing and evaluations,
confidential Shoot-Outs with competing products, calibration and optimization
for displays, cameras and their User Interface, plus on-site and factory visits.
We help manufacturers with expert display procurement, prototype development,
and production quality control so they don’t make mistakes similar to those
that are exposed in our Display Technology Shoot-Out series. See our world
renown Display Technology
Shoot-Out public article series for an introduction and preview. DisplayMate’s advanced
scientific optimizations can make lower cost panels look as good or better than
more expensive higher performance displays. If you are a display or product
manufacturer and want to turn your display into a spectacular one to surpass
your competition then Contact
DisplayMate Technologies to learn more.
Copyright © 2014 by Society for Information Display. All Rights
Reserved.
Copyright © 1990-2014 by DisplayMate Technologies Corporation. All
Rights Reserved.
This article, or any part thereof, may not be copied,
reproduced, mirrored, distributed or incorporated
into any other work without the prior written permission of
DisplayMate Technologies Corporation